Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Bitcoin is on the verge of a constitutional crisis
arrow_back

Bitcoin is on the verge of a constitutional crisis

1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
?
Unknown Aug 19, 2015 12:37 PM
To
Jeffrey Epstein

Seen this?

Bitcoin is on the verge of a constitutional crisis By Timothy B. Lee

Aug 18 2015

http://www.vox.com/2015/8/18/9168977/bitcoin-constitutional-crisis

The Bitcoin community is facing one of the most momentous decisions in its=six-year history. The Bitcoin network is running out of spare capacity, and=two increasingly divided camps disagree about what, if anything, to do abou= the problem.

If these two sides fail to reach a consensus, the Bitcoin network could =80 according to one side, at least — slowly grind to a halt as t=e number of transactions exceeds the network's capacity to process them. Ev=n worse, if a fix for this problem is forced through prematurely, it could s=lit the Bitcoin network in two and permanently damage public trust in the n=twork.

The argument is the closest thing the Bitcoin community has had to a const=tutional crisis. Bitcoiners are trying to figure out who, if anyone, has th= authority to make technical changes to the Bitcoin network's foundations. 5= far, neither side in the increasingly heated debate has shown much willing=ess to compromise.

The Bitcoin network is running out of capacity

The Bitcoin network processes transactions in units called "blocks," which=are created about every 10 minutes. To prevent malicious parties from clogg=ng up the system with spam, the original Bitcoin software limited the size o= each block to one megabyte, which corresponds to a few thousand transactio=s. When Bitcoin was created in 2009, that left plenty of room for growth.

But Bitcoin usage has been growing, bringing the network closer and closer=to its maximum capacity. Right now, the network is only 30 to 40 percent fu=l on average, but it sometimes gets congested during periods of high demand= causing delays for users. And if current growth continues, things could ge= a lot worse in the next year or two, as the network gets closer to 100 per=ent capacity.

And if Bitcoin is going to become a mainstream payment platform, it's goin= to have to grow a lot more. Bitcoin handles tens of thousands of transacti=ns per day. Visa handles tens of millions. To compete with Visa and other m=instream payment technologies, the network is going to need more capacity.

Changing the limit is easy — if everyone agrees

The limit is just a number in the Bitcoin software. If that number were ch=nged to a higher value, the Bitcoin network would have more capacity.

The difficulty is that this only works if everyone agrees to raise the lim=t. The Bitcoin network is built on consensus. If some parts of the Bitcoin n=twork raise the limit and others don't, the network would be split in two. H=ving two

competing versions of the Bitcoin network running simultaneously w=uld be catastrophic. It would destroy trust in the Bitcoin network, since u=ers could never be sure which transactions were official. And it would like=y cause the value of bitcoins — the unit of currency — to p=unge, as people questioned whether the network had a future at all.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV