Re:

Lets discuss. FYI, I have been thinking about pioneering new sciences of causality, rare events causing cascades within systems, understanding distributions, and how to represent these in fresh ways to allow new kinds of science to happen.

what about an institute in cambridge for math of life, biological computing, the next step of evolution beyond language

i have some ideas. are you around tomorw or wed. I might have to cancel fri trip. . I think your chance luck idea, is critical

Yes, might be around both days.. Morning meeting either day???

Tomorw?7?

Yes good

its clear that the chance curves are constant. how to move up the curve , is luck. feyman when discussing quantum said each particle hits a surface, some percentage are reflected, its impossible to alter one and change the outcome, this always disturbed him. he said it was clearly true , but no one could explain it. some people will die of car accidents. ? not sure you can alter if its you or not.. unless you dont drive.?

in the context of risk with chance events, always these problems of dealing with various "freak" outliers and coincidences providing exceptions and wrecking models, but let's turn it on its head- how are contingencies structured to block, bridge, or amplify other contingencies, to shift the entire game space? Is this really what evolution is doing all the time??

Of course it can be purely deterministic but interface with schrodinger measure problems very strange