Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re: metric
arrow_back

Re: metric

5 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
L
Lisa Randall Oct 2, 2009 5:27 PM
To
Jeffrey Epstein

Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-- since they are changing with time and a bit more complicated but indeed they have 2 horizons (just like charged black holes). Two horizon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2d big bang scenario (with the other 2d in a compact sphere). Space expands out until you reach the horizon and eventually goes over into flat space. It's not really accelerated expansion but still somewhat along lines you suggested. If there are two horizons (charged black hole case) and you are in between them (we called this Whoville becuase it looks like space has shrunk to zero but actually spacetime has not and there is a finite time between them so there's a whole world invisible to the outside) what happens is you alternate between big bang and big crunch in the full extended spacetime.

J
Jeffrey Epstein Oct 2, 2009 5:27 PM
To
Lisa Randall

thanks , question , what does it look like if time is running backward wouldn't it be decelerating„ into flat space from the singularity outward„ therefore explosion than [then] expansion. It looks like big bang, not inflation before horizon. So not explosive expansion. but always slowing after crossing the horizon after crossing horizon there isn't really a cosmological interpretation anymore. Time and space have switched back. looking in reverse it appears things accelerate as they approach„ charged would be as a result of the deceleration. don't understand this last comment.

L
Lisa Randall Oct 2, 2009 5:41 PM
To
Jeffrey Epstein

I think I'm reaching the limits of my ability to disentangle grammar and spelling but here goes:

J
Jeffrey Epstein Oct 2, 2009 6:00 PM
To
Lisa Randall

joking, for me, space and time are disconnected as my fingers hunt for keys

L
Lisa Randall Oct 2, 2009 10:12 PM
To
Jeffrey Epstein

You can calculate the value of time and make a new metric.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV