Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right (no subject)
arrow_back

(no subject)

2 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
B
Ben Goertzel Jan 20, 2010 5:38 AM
To
Jeffrey Epstein

Maybe I should wait till after your birthday to pursue the AI discussion, but it's fresh in my mind now so I'll send this email now ... if you don't feel like reading it on your birthday you'll wait ;-)

Seriously, my view is

-- those letters show that, in the view of some prestigious and rather conservative AI profs, this is not a bogus project. It's a real, solid research project ... it's good AI research

-- whether the project will lay the golden egg, those profs did not have the info to judge. And unless someone pays them a bunch of $S to study my project carefully, they are not going to pay enough attention to gather enough info to judge

How I think you should look at this is: "if Ben has even a 5% chance of success, it's worth the $$, because the upside potential is TREMENDOUS"

And I think you SHOULD consider it to have a 5% chance of success ... greater...

The fact that these AI profs think it's interesting but aren't convinced of its transformative potential, doesn't mean anything bad... if you think so, you don't understand academics ;-p

If the $$ is an issue for you, I can do this for $500H/year here in China, using some of my Brazilian team as well.

$1.5M for the first true breakthrough in AI history, and a big step toward the Singularity ;-) ... it's a lot of $$ to most people, but not much to you. What else are you donating to that has the same potential? The labs you've funded at Harvard and MIT and Stanford are good labs, but they're not going to change the world.... My project will, if someone with $$ and vision will fund it...

But, you already know what I think and feel.... I'm not a salesman; and I don't really know how else to convince you, except to somehow build the damn thing on somebody else's dollar, and then along with everyone else you'll see in retrospect that I actually wasn't full of shit ;p

B
Ben Goertzel Jan 20, 2010 1:30 PM

Oh, by the way, I was so concerned about my AI project I didn't notice you mentioned your birthday in the chat...

Happy birthday!! ;-)

Now if you want to have 100000 more birthdays you should fund my AI project so we can create a thinking machine that will solve the problem of mortality!!! ;-D

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV