Re: project

my suggestion is that we use the twenty or so scientists that i have funded. murray , seth lloyd trivers, edelman, smmlin, hillis, and use their stories as web page hits.. epstein funded so and so, could be the web page for forbcs. etc.. , tramo, kosslyyn howard gardner, george church, novak, krausss, the events in st thomas, minsky, sussman, abelson, artificial intell, qquatum computing, mind brain, etc.. you should have plenty of good stuff to reference for higher search parametrs.

mind brain bchaciour hamrd„ music and the brain, llawrence krauss , dark kenergy, also there is a list of 30 charities in the virgin islands,

Jeff,

I have to hand it to you, and I am not saying this lightly, but you fund some very interesting and very good work. It's very impressive to me, as I am pretty familiar with almost all the people, and it is rare to have someone have such good taste. It's not easy to separate the wheat from the chaff, as there is so much of the latter out there. I think the work that Murray is doing with Jim Hartle is extremely interesting for example, and I have always been a big fan of Kosslyn on language. The four volume MIT series he edited was just excellent. Smollin has gotten more interesting lately. On a personal note, I have never been able to decide whether Al is either a pseudoscience or a protoscience. Although I like Marvin a lot, and we are good friends, and he has hosted me to talk at MIT, etc., I didn't think too much of his Society of Mind... I think the cognitive approach will produce better results... Would you be at all be interested in supporting Rama's work? He is doing some interesting and exciting things in his lab now... he takes a much more low tech approach, which is also useful...

Got plenty to work on. Full steam on this... Things will start to be appearing....

tramo ?

That's the only one I wasn't familiar with, but got enough to go with....