Re:

• your settlement doc s say march 6 -koch, statment is march 5- only one day before" the foundation people arc going to pull up the lawsuit, and will forward all dots i told them there should be a court ordered confindentiality as per your email

• you said you won the case, i transmitted what you said. you asked that i help fund your education proposal I did that. court dots and registrar will put this to bed. i am in a meeting untl late

I am not forwarding anything at all.except your proposal re thinking; they will do their own homework . they will be extremely thorough,

What have you done??? What are you trying to do to me????

• As part of the settlement, I am only allowed to state that the case was settled, and that supply his sworn statement that his statements about me were false. I am not supposed to go into any details.... It's all supposed to be sealed.

You can only forward them, Mclver's statement admitting that he falsely accused me of various things, which I sent you before. This is allowed to be shown. I have another Court document that accompanies this, which I am also allowed to show. This will be reflected in the Court documents.

• You can forward them Christofs sworn declaration and the other declarations, I sent you today. The Caltech ID and Feynman thing is ok too.

• The rest of the libel/slander case, details, depositions, testimony, transcripts, etc., were sealed at the close of the case. If I reveal any information about the details in regard to that case, I may have broken the seal agreement not to discuss it, and I don't even want to go there and risk losing my settlement.

• I do appreciate your trying to get me help with funding on the educational project, but would like to interact with these people directly, and they also need to look at the others involved.

• If they want references of leading academics who are very familiar with me and my work product, I can gladly supply them.

• I am just worried about the register's office, as they may give a similar off putting response like Kosslyn did, because I never went in there after the case was settled, to clear it up. That libel case went on for about 2 years.

BTW, he wrote to both Caltech (everywhere President, register, provost, my lab partners, colleagues), etc. that I was a "convicted felon." It was really egregious stuff. His letter to Kosslyn was "Do you really want a convicted felon claiming to work in your lab...."

This is why Kosslyn bailed. i have the correspondence, although now sealed.

This is for your eyes only.

• I took care of this list. Sorry about the confusion, I thought you were talking about something else. That list was not supposed to go up, it went up by accident, that why I was misdirected by what you wrote.

That's fine. All three documents that I sent you will be sufficient and gladly appreciated.

Going out now to dinner with Madonna's manager. Speak later.