Fwd: INSPECTION COMPLETED (CINCINNATI, OH) - LULL

Greetings Boscoe,

If you have a chance can you review this report and give =e your thoughts? Thank you in

advance, DW

This is going to be blunt.

This is another sad joke, in my opinion.

L.S1 HAS one like this, that no one seems capable =r willing repair. Buying another machine Like the Failed unit, that is =ngineered to service complicated multifunctional professional =onstruction sites (who have professional operators) is screwing the principal for the second time. Chris the landscaper insisted on buying =his type of lull. It is unnecessarily complex for the needs of both =slands. By he and others ignoring expert advice (to get another =nit like the one that still runs and serves its purpose,( I do not recall the model number) have put the Principal in the =osition of throwing the failed unit away and replacing it.

Common sense and thoughtful insight suggests that =ne replace the bogus unit with one just like the smooth cover lull we =ave that works. They have: like engines, filters, lines and functions. No need for gobs if different =ilters and other nonsense. Lifts 54 feet in the air and about 10,000 =ounds up close. Also, the rubber stamp inspection report is =s insightful as a sucker punch. My granddaughter could have been more =nsightful. Buying this makes no sense =hatsoever. A few weeks ago I saw pics of a unit like =he functioning one on someone's phone at LSJ. Investigate

that =ne.

Get someone who at least tries to be a =urchaser advocate. Look at that one with someone not just with a =amera and no scientific inspection ability. In the report, The reporter =aid nothing about operating the unit them-self, only reported =nformation similar to what you hear at a junky used car lot from a slippery =alesman. ... not an advocate for the purchaser.

weak... really weak.

Leave this one in the report, =lone. It has functions not needed here and the =omplexity serves to open an inexperienced operator to disaster. More =ging hoses and a rubber stamp copy if one that has languished, =nrepaired for months. This is not intended to be cordial as the =ame information was offered the last time someone bought the 'failed' =nit. No one listened. Is anyone listening now?? Who is sure that the reportedly failed =ransmission is actually dead?? Has anyone tried to function test =he control soleniods ? Was the proper fluid used in the =ransmission?? Waaaay more questions than answers =ere.

Respectfully Submitted.

Greetings Boscoe,

Thank you for the insight =) DW

i had talk with bosco last week and he is back on board =illing to help he did not ask for more money and is =ontent however feeling a bit empowered as can be seen by email =elow please advise thank =ou

Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 =exington Avenue, 4th Floor
New =ork, NY 10022
tel ██████████
fax ██████████
cel ██████████