(no subject)

I'll think about that.
For now, here's the paper I had on blue eyes
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/11/blue-eyed-ice-queens-and-brown-eyed.php
Maybe Melanin supplementation would help a lot.

This is surprisingly hard for me, as the very large majority of my efforts are directed at people with social agendas of one sort or another. There are some very smart and interesting people like Michael Nielsen, http://michaelnielsen.org, whose agendas are almost entirely confined to the scientific community. My focus is very long term, and not very affected by do-gooding cliche, but ala Szilard, it really is generally directed by what I expect to be important. Domains like fundamental physics, while they sound very interesting, seem high-leverage unlikely to (although be important I do vaguely enough think to justify that anyone the level who of expertise needed hasn't jumped onto to reliably the information determine theoretic what's really bandwagon by now should probably get with the program).

OTOH, you mention 'cures' here, and I'm certainly familiar with a lot of those. Especially in regenerative medicine and cancer, though schizophrenia and OCD interest me much more.

Philip Tetlock.

what was the guy at penns name? lack?