RE:

In your opinion, bow is sex

related to trust?

a continum

So you can gain trust through intimacy
through sex?

Posdible

Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone

into-me-see
still experimenting but on a different level

details?

I take
higher
risk in
order
to have
higher
return.

What has your best student achieved so far?

bliss

Try Faust, this will
be hard.

the deal was worth it

My Mephistopheles,

Starting neutrally, I try things and if it makes me happy I do and if it doesn't, I don't do. Very easy and I had great sex.

not good enough, make happy is cheap. like sweet candy„ it has to get you thinking, otherwise it will all fade quickly

So girls are like candy.

everythinkg is like candy, sweet , too sweet, chewy, long lasting, bitter, want more never again etc

You are having way too much candy. You want more and more as you get bored by the taste easier and faster, it is a vicious circle.

no , if you don;t like a candy its better to spit it out and try another you shoudl go back to being a student and stop attempting to philosophize its childish,

I am being a student.

• You are having way too much candy. You want more and more as you get bored by the taste easier and faster, it is a vicious circle. this is not a question , it is a conclusion. and a waste of your time

I took some time to overthink your messages:

• So first you say your best student achieved bliss which is by definition complete happiness, isn't it? Then you say something that makes one happy - happiness - is cheap like sweet candy and not good enough as it does not get one thinking, don't you? But then you state that everything is like candy, which by definition is out of sugar, which is sweet, even if there exist different variations of candy. So the achievement of your best student is also like candy - isn't it? - which is not good enough and therefore not really an achievement, or is it? So what gets one thinking if everything is like candy?

it is always easy to come to erroneious conclusions when your definitions are fraught with errors. bliss is not complete happiness. where did you find that bourgoiuis definiton.. candy is not sugar. , you are trying too hard to be right, and slipping on a banana peel of the common

I am trying to understand. 1 always questioned the assumptions in order to be corrected by right anwers. Just saying that it is wrong, how can I learn from that?

(Btw I wrote candy is out of sugar and not that it is sugar.) So, would you please give me the right answers if you know?