Fwd: Alternative to Big Bang Lambda-CDM Cosmology
Dear Mr. Epstein,
Lambda-CDM My name that is does Michael not require Feldman, the and existence I'm a theoretical of the yet to physicist be understood proposing and an even alternative directly to observed concepts of "dark energy" and "dark matter". I do this by incorporating the observed features which we currently associate with these "dark" fellows into a reformulated understanding of inertial motion as well as inertial frames of reference in empty vacuum.
However, in order to reformulate inertial motion as well as inertial frames of reference in empty vacuum, one must abandon the two most fundamental pillars of modern physics, Newton's first law and Einstein's special relativity. I'm sure you can tell at this point that my approach to solving these problems associated with "dark energy" and "dark matter" is rather unconventional and severely controversial.
Given your own personal history of being open-minded to new and controversial scientific ideas and being a successful independent entrepreneur, I was hoping we could possibly speak further about the unbelievable potential involved with my approach as well as the implications for the future of physics and science. I've provided links below to my publication for your own convenience.
PLOS ONE: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0078114
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1182
Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I very much appreciate it. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Michael Feldman
Forwarded message
From: Michael Feldman
Date: Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:03 AM
Subject: Alternative to Big Bang Lambda-CDM Cosmology
To: jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org
Dear Mr. Epstein,
Lambda-CDM My name that is does Michael not require Feldman, the and existence I'm a theoretical of the yet to physicist be understood proposing and an even alternative directly to observed concepts of "dark energy" and "dark matter". I do this by incorporating the observed features which we currently associate with these "dark" fellows into a reformulated understanding of inertial motion as well as inertial frames of reference in empty vacuum.
However, in order to reformulate inertial motion as well as inertial frames of reference in empty vacuum, one must abandon the two most fundamental pillars of modern physics, Newton's first law and Einstein's special relativity. I'm sure you can tell at this point that my approach to solving these problems associated with "dark energy" and "dark matter" is rather unconventional and severely controversial.
Given your own personal history of being open-minded to new and controversial scientific ideas and being a successful independent entrepreneur, I was hoping we could possibly speak further about the unbelievable potential involved with my approach as well as the implications for the future of physics and science. I've provided links below to my publication for your own convenience.
PLOS ONE: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0078114
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1182
Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I very much appreciate it. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Michael Feldman