Huffington

Hi Jeffrey,

thoughts on Huffington:

The fact that she allowed such sordid headlines on you to appear and to still remain is offensive.

Agreeing to a finacial column will generate a wave of negative press on you. And that's what she wants: any-- publicity.

She has media power though-- so maybe:

she removes all negative comment on you, no more bad press in the future, periodically publish some of your press releases and in exchange you will generate a science column for the science section of her blog.

• The science column would be written by a rotating scientist (Kip Thome, Lisa Randall, Stephen Hawkings etc)

• The scientist writes down a question that they are working on/ tackling.

• scicntist writes a quick answer on their thinking.

• The scientist can promote their webpage/ book etc

• The concept would be open to discussion/commentary.

• Your foundation would be cited in each posting with a link back to your website.

• You retain the right to post all of this content on your websites.

• You have the right to approve all content.

• Best answers to the scientist's question arc archived and could be published/addressed in a later post.

You shouldn't write anything because it will backfire. Best to only cite your foundation which has your name. The media won't look at the science section. But the search engines will pick it up.

Column could be called:

"Brainstorming: top scientists share what they are grappling with. Join the discussion." In collaboration with The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation. This week, we welcome Lawrence Krauss, proof etc

Lawrence Krauss: What is empty space? So far, the only thing we know is that empty space isn't quite zero. We know this because.... etc.