Re: today's papers
I would not act till then. And I would hit very hard on media's willingness to hide behind court documents and repeat all manner of preposterous allegations. In that regard, I think you should prepare a detailed list of the most preposterous aspects of all this--this will give the NYT and WSJ some pause.
On Saturday, January 3, 2015, jeffrey E. jeevacation@gmail.com wrote:
not yet. but they will,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Michael Wolff wrote:
A statement from you or your reps does open in up in the U.S. Is the Times or WSJ calling you for comment?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Michael Wolff wrote:
Probably. Issue is how much this is spreading to US, or if it is still remains mostly British tabloid story?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:08 AM, jeffrey E. jeevacation@gmail.com wrote:
if she is the spokesperson it will ratchet up the attention thoughts!?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:55 AM, jeffrey E. jeevacation@gmail.com wrote:
kathy ruemmler former white house counsel and good buddy, is suggesting she responds on my behalf to the press inquires. ? thoughts?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:19 AM, jeffrey E. jeevacation@gmail.com wrote:
whoops
Forwarded message
From: Ian Osborne
Date: Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:38 AM
Subject: today's papers
To: Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com
Jeffrey,
Happy New Year.
Rather unfortunately, your ongoing case has made the front page of every British newspaper today (see attached).
I hope that all ok.
Best wishes,
Ian