Re: Results

Jeffrey,

The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a m=nute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google,=which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely har= to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uplo=ds massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from =ut side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at =he top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and t=e org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk=, we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. =E did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far re=oved, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent.

Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatica=ly when you typed in your name are also now removed.

Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the =op of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicte= sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundati=n, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site,=and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad st=ff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing an= wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the=mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption.= This was a big success.

We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previou=ly buried on page 5 of google search.

We have =romoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with y=ur material.

And, while the sites are up, and in =he direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, espe=ially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis.=l have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as wel= as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (=till on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the article= to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images= and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your =ug shot, etc.

Your daily beast foe is still=at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we=try to depromote you.

As far as this site is conc=rned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. =learly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you w=nt to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually=it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old for=. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to g=t better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and tha= means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. =riters need to know what to write. THe

philanthrophy site is at the bottom=of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content t= it, and as a result it suffers.

You paid M=ke $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, =ut his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let=me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not goin= to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time =here.

This needs to be contrasted =ith what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/=0 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline.

over the weekend.

Conshita is very media navy, as you are probably well aware= She knows exactly what we are doing, and is taking her own counter-measur=s, but it is constant wack-a-mole with her.