tighter draft with jerry's deletions..

I am writing this as a follow-up to my meeting with
both you and Lanna, in an attempt to resolve the
Epstein matter. At that meeting , after eight months
of investigation, , you and I learned for the very
first time , and I believe to our collective
disbelief, that the allegation of the girl in
question,as Lanna read us her statement ( a girl I
might add whose credibility we agreed is at
best marginal) did not raise the slightest hint, of
actual sex. Up until then my client and I had been
laboring under the assumption that the girl had
alleged mulitple sexual encounters. It was with this
fact in mind that we searched out the toughtest
interrogator that we could find. We hired George
Slattery, an expert in polygraphs highly respected by
both the law enforcement community and specifically
your office, to confirm my clients long held position
that there was both, no sex, and that the girl had
clearly represented her age as 18 years old. The lie
detector test confirmed both unequivacally. As sex
was not alleged, I would ask you to recall your
previous statements regarding the fact that you
wouldn't bring a "touching case". in fact NO sex NO
charge. This policy you described was you
illustrated by the story of a 15 year old stripper.
With respect the girls' credibility:We have
previously provided you copies of her
original web page where she initially presented
herself as 17 years of age. , (accompanied by a
graphic
nude photograph), then , in her own words she is "
kicked
off" the server due to the suggestive nature of her
photo. She then changes her age to 16, along with
additional bragging about shoplifting "alot", underage
drinking , smoking,( assuredly requiring her to
repeatedly lie about her age) and having sex. She
then , only four
days before the last scheduled grand jury, and ten
days after being described by a police officer as
clearly on drugs, unable to stand ,with bloodshot and
dilated eyes(the police report filed on MArch 31,
2006, copy provided), changes her age once again , but
now to 15. As if this were not enough, her lastest
rendition of her web page, only two weeks old, is now
entitled " FUCK YA 2, " emblazoned with a new
suggestive photo. ,

. We have also provided this new page, accompanied by
an additional
police report, but this time from Georgia, stating she
had run away and been eventually found in a highly
direputable drug complex.(report also provided) The
issue of her credibility is certainly not strengthened
, by her own father's statement that she has been
using drugs since the age of 14 , and was previously
admitted into a rehab facility. You would be right to
question the father's veracity however, as we have
also provided to you the documentation detailing his
previous felony conviction and evidence of his serving
prison time for bank fraud. I think it would be
helpful to descibe the facts of this case as agreed...
This girl, was driven to my clients' home (by a
stripper, who told her to be certain to represent
herself as 18) , with the express and sole purpose to
provide him a topless massage. She told him she was
18, before she left ,she received her agreed upon
two hundred dollars, wrote her phone number down and
stated that next time she would like to bring her twin
sister along.My client never saw her again. We are led
to believe that several MONTHS
later, one of her parents(her mother, also a
fraudster,
completing her own P.T.I. , in only March of this
year)
contacted the police. Barry,as you consider your
options ,I frankly think it unfair to give much
weight to the pressure being brought to bear by law
enforcement. Their expressed desire to see my client
embarassed if need be by the spectacle of a public
trial, even though they know the case is very weak
certainly indicates, at a minimum a lack of
objectivity.
. I believe , that it is only right , that as we are
both certain that there was no sex involved that you
now decide NOT
to charge this case.I am aware of the fact that Lanna
had stated at our
earlier meeting, that day, that she wanted a
couple of misdemeanors, but given the totality of the

facts in this case , coupled with the fact that a
Google search is now a
"forever" reference on job applications, I believe
that both the girls
involved , my client , and all concerned would be
better served with at at most an informal resolution
of this case.
I would certainly be preferable to the filing of a
charge that we all currently concede
would likely not succeed if it were to be brought to
trial. I appreciate the personal attention you have
given to this matter, and look forward to you
response.

__

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com