arrow_back
Re: Pro Mar Services, Inc. Survey
1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
J. Epstein Oct 31, 2006 8:11 PM
To
<DKIESQ@aol.com>
asl lynn if the pilings were replaced I don't think so.. if they wern't stick it up amerlins ass
----- Original Message ----
From: "DKIESQ@aol.com" <DKIESQ@aol.com>
To: jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33:33 AM
Subject: Pro Mar Services, Inc. Survey
From: "DKIESQ@aol.com" <DKIESQ@aol.com>
To: jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33:33 AM
Subject: Pro Mar Services, Inc. Survey
I spoke to Mark at Pro Mar Services who told me or confirmed the following
relevant information:
1. Pro Mar is not a marine surveyor; "its in the
piling business"
2. The tide information was for Benner Bay and
Dohm's marina is in Jessup Bay; Mark claims that no tide information is
available for Jessup bay. Mark said there is very little tidal activity in
the area anyway, so Mark believes the tidal info its probably not all that
relevant.
3. Mark claims that he took the readings at Zero
tide, but when I asked him how he knows it was zero tide, he told me he would
have to use tide scales. When I reminded him that there is no tidal info
for Jessup bay, he told me that there is probably no difference in height of
tides between Benner and Jessup and only a matter of 30 minutes or so with
respect to high and low tides.
4. His physical survey was minimal, he simply looked
at the dock. He noted his belief the the light structure of the
dock makes it suitable for light boats only and if you were to moor regular
40 to 50 foot boats you would need a different structure.
5. When I asked Mark how he knew what condition the
pilings were in, he told me that the operator of the dock told him that pilings
were replaced a few years back. Moreover, Mark told me that the pilings
are not driven into the sea bed; instead, the pilings are "Jetted in" with
water.
6. No evaluation of the floating office or
the materials on the sea bed to which the floating office is moored.
Mark's only comment was that the "office" was not much of anything and would be
probably safer to get rid of it.
Conclusion: Rather than get a full survey of the marina as I asked him
to, it appears John had one of his cronies drop depth lines to
measure depth.and simply give a cursory look at the condition of the
marina. John knew that this was for a potential acquisition.
Darren K.
Indyke
Attorney-At-Law
457 Madison Avenue
4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-750-1176
Fax: 212-750-0381
e-mail: dkiesq@aol.com
Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any attachments contain information from Darren K. Indyke, Esq. that constitute attorney work product or that are otherwise confidential and/or privileged. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender at the above telephone number or electronic mail address. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law.
Attorney-At-Law
457 Madison Avenue
4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-750-1176
Fax: 212-750-0381
e-mail: dkiesq@aol.com
Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any attachments contain information from Darren K. Indyke, Esq. that constitute attorney work product or that are otherwise confidential and/or privileged. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender at the above telephone number or electronic mail address. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law.
