Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re: Fwd: FW: LSJ
arrow_back

Re: Fwd: FW: LSJ

1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
J. Epstein Mar 26, 2007 6:51 PM
To
<DKIESQ@aol.com>
keep in mind she is working for g st james also

----- Original Message ----
From: "DKIESQ@aol.com" <DKIESQ@aol.com>
To: jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:11:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: FW: LSJ

fyi
 
Darren K. Indyke
Attorney-At-Law
457 Madison Avenue
4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-750-1176
Fax: 212-750-0381
e-mail: dkiesq@aol.com
 
------------------------------
IRS Circular 230 Legend: Any advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Unless otherwise specifically indicated above, you should assume that any statement in this email relating to any U.S. federal, state, or local tax matter was written in connection with the promotion or marketing by other parties of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this email. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
================================================================= 
Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any attachments contain information from Darren K. Indyke, Esq. that constitute attorney work product or that are otherwise confidential and/or privileged. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender at the above telephone number or electronic mail address. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law.
=================================================================




AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

This note, thanks to Choice VI came in late Friday. It raised as many questions as it answered. I just called Amy to go over them. She is on her way to STT. She is going to Fish & Wildlife this morning for other business. Their office is right near us. She is going to call me when she is done and I will have her come by our office.

 

Lafayette Construction LLC

6100 Red Hook Quarter, Suite A2-7

St. Thomas, VI 00802

Tel: 340 779-8054

Fax:340 779-8055

Cell:340 690-7194


From: Amy Claire Dempsey [mailto:bioimpact@islands.vi]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:52 AM
To: 'John Amerling'
Subject: LSJ

 

Sorry this has taken me so long to get back to you.  I am still bombarded with transition team issues along with my already more than busy schedule, everyone wants to complain about how slow everything is going, and I am running into the same issues myself.

 

COE

 

I will be talking with Jose Cedano later this morning.  He has told me that he should have an answer later on this morning as to whether or not he will be taking the Virgin Islands back over.  We will be far better off if he does because he does not have the prejudice against the project Vivian seems to have.  I thing we should be in pretty good shape with what we have in at the moment, and he should be able to act on the information we have submitted.  But I do think you and I should go and visit him and talk through everything to refresh his memory.

 

My cost for the visit will be approximately $1000 plus airfare which is right now running at $185.00 round trip St. Croix/San Juan.

 

Beach Re-nourishment

 

The real issue we need to first determine is what they are going to define as “beach” under their jurisdiction.  I can see Fish and Wildlife having jurisdiction or even interest in the nourishment if it is place within area that are potential turtle nesting habitats, wetlands or wildlife habitats.  The placement of sand on the upper portions of the beach beyond where it could end up in the sea, except under the worst sea conditions should not present problem with permitting.  The placement of the appropriate type of sand could in fact “enhance the beach for turtle nesting activities.

 

Our biggest issue we face is we have to get them off the beach with vehicles.  This has been an on going issue and the beach continues to be a thoroughfare.  This not only endangers nest which are already in the ground, it also compacts the sand and makes it less favorable for nesting, and it is something we have continued to represent we will stop doing. 

 

As I a sure you are aware “shorelines’ are defined in the VI Code as ..”the area along the coastline of the Virgin Islands from the seaward line of low tide, running inland a distance of fifty feet, or to the extreme seaward boundary of the natural vegetation which spreads continuously inland, or to the natural barrier, whichever is the shortest distance. 

 

There is nothing in the Environmental Laws and Regulations of the Virgin Islands nor in the Zoning Code as it relates to beach nourishment.  Unfortunately it is one of those items which is “up in the air” as to what is required.  It gives David Olsen a large amount of leeway in determining what he requires. CZM fortunately is defined and it should require no more than a minor permit.

 

I would think the best course of action will be to first go ahead and get the grain size analysis done of both the existing beach sand and the Barbuda sand.  I would suggest that the sample of the existing sand be taken out of the water rather than off the beach seeing that there has been so much activity there and much of what is on the beach is “contaminated” with finer caliche type materials.    I know that there has been some placement of inappropriate material on the beach in the past. 

 

We should then go and talk to David Olsen.  I believe if we keep the sand out of the area of impact of the sea, we should not have to do current studies and the like.  We do have some fairly good information right now, but we do not have full blown current studies of the area to allow for the placement of sand to the waterline.

 

Our biggest issue with the nourishment will be the Turtles.

 

RO

 

I have a meeting with David Simone on another issue on Monday and will inquire about what he would like us to do to start expanding our TPDES permit.

 

I look forward to hearing form you on these issues and I will let you know what I hear from Jose Cedano.

 

Amy




Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV