(no subject)

I need to refine the initial pitch.. 1.Our team consists of professionals with over 250 years of criminal experience. We have also consulted with outside ethics experts,former gov't officials ,and the clear and unanimous consensus is they find the conduct outragious and frankly not one of them , has seen anything like this before.. .2 . After the state had conducted its own investigation and returned a grand jury indictment.,the federal gov't ,all the while refusing to coordinate with the duly elected district attorney, and his sex prosecutor of 13 years, ,, engaged in an extortion , to force the defendant himself to go the state ,and demand that he be charged with a crime greater than the state and grand jury thought appropriate. . and demand a sentence greater than the state wanted. They compounded the outrageous behavior by then demanding that he pay a list of people , unnamed to date, a minimum amount o, 150 thousand each. no matter what their
actual damages, in exchange for the gov't not prosecuting him for crimes, that they , the feds could only make the most tenuous connection to. The ausa then suggested the defendant be required to hire one of her friends as a
continengcy lawyer to , be paid for by the defendant to actually sue the defendant ,on behalf of a list of adults that she would make avaliable after sentencing.. They threatened to use a sex tourism statute 2423 ( with a min sentence of 5 years) , and apply it to a man going home to Florida, a state where he has had a home for twenty years. they also threatened , to bring a case based on the Internet luring statute,2422 that would have to be tortured beyond all recognition to apply.( there was no internet use at all). They demanded a jail sentence for someone , who had no criminal history,, no violence , drugs, no position of authority, then when they were confronted with an extensive brief as to why these atutes did not apply they threatened to bring a money crime based on a illegal money transmitting business, even though no such businesss actually existed.. After subpoenaing his tax returns , and medical records, they then suggested a money
laundering charge or a host of others including the mann act, obstruction etc. , even though the prerequisitie of a specified unlawful activity, could not be described.

  ____________________________________________________________________________________

Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how. http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/