FW: Follow up
From: David Gold
[mailto:dgold@goldcommunications.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:01 PM
To: Lesley Groff
Subject: Follow up
Leslie,
As we discussed, I have attached an opinion letter from my election law
attorney.
Please note the bolded section below in the final paragraph:
Since the direct mail pieces you have
described meet none of those four standards, they
do not meet the “content” prong of the three-part coordination test and thus
will not be
considered in-kind contributions. Furthermore, since they will not
advocate for or against any
particular candidates, nor will they even “promote, support, attack, or oppose”
such a
candidate, a group that limits its activities to funding these ads will not
constitute a political
committee, and thus will not have to comply with the limits, prohibitions,
and disclosure
obligations imposed on such committees but the Federal Election Campaign Act.
For
the reasons detailed in the letter, that means that any payment from Mr.
Epstein to my firm (Gold Communications Company) for issue advocacy mail will
not be subject to any disclosure nor will it be disclosed to the FEC or anyone
else.
Please let me know if Mr. Epstein has any other questions. If not, please let
me know how he wishes the invoice to be prepared and I will send it to you.
Many thanks,
Dave Gold
President
Gold Communications
www.goldcommunications.com
575-776-1486
