jon roth

  Sloman issues.. we have a signed agreement.. we don't know the allegations or the theory of the case. we do know that they preferred to not prosecute the case, and they chose to defer to to state.it was their idea ) as long as we went and demanded a harsher punishment. in essence  deputizing the defense team to act on their behalf.  he told drew they have forty minor victims. PROTECT CHILDREN  ( lets assume there was sex with girls all 17 years old, now some as old as 24,  consensual and for money.) the feds argue that even though the state has never prosecuted anyone for underage sex at 17, they are in fact minors under the fed defintion and subject to federal law.)/ . dag sensitvities. a rich man getting special treatment. and access.  I think if ken agrees, Filip should  be both convinced something is severely amiss here, and shocked by some of the details.i.e.  I hesitate to describe some of the shall we say unique conditions that
we've had to deal with. I risk you thinking of me  a crackpot, who might also next swear they 've been abducted by little green men . Instead of a former judge and doj official. but here goes. Keep in mind this is only one example of what we have had to endure .Sloman  required as a condtion precedent to deferring
prosecution , to the STATE, already unprecedented , the demand that Epstein pay a minimum of 150 k to a list of girls , all now adults, whose names he refused to give us until Epstein was is in jail. and even then Epstein defense  was to be limited to only ask one question, " have you ever met Epstein" . In addtion he must pay for an attorney chosen by the govt ( the first one  a close friend of the ausa live in boyfriend)  to represent
the adults in case they want to bring litigation against him. I know you think i've exaggerated tha facts but alas , in fact  I minimized them. they would also be told that if they chose their own attorney he would not be obligated to pay their fees , so they should choose the one the govt recommends. If that is not enough,  re the new york times leak - in every other leak case , it is usually  impossible to prove, as the journalist hides behind the priviledge. here, jay, reviewed the reporters contemporaneous notes . don't believe the spin of Epsteins high priced attnys, he has no defense. he wanted house arrest with special conditions . We actually  received the details of the govts theory of the case from the reporter. as the prosecutors refused to give it to us. we need enough time to explain.. its been two years of investigation probably the most expeditious wasy ist o actaully start at the end  . Just taking SLomans last letter , dissecting it
, pointing out its blatant and provable falsehoods, its mischaracterizations, , its innacurate recitation of events , should be quite a start for any reviewer. .