Re: responsibilities.
We have no communication at all for now with Alex or Jeff or anyone else in that office. That is critical.
Sloman has now communicated twice with me so the ball is in my court. But given the ongoing review, I don't think I want to respond at all yet until I get a sense of how much interaction we will be able to have with Mark's office.
For now, let's assume that what we want is a package of materials to send to Mark's deputy - and we should decide if we can improve on our big sugal presentation or not.
We also clearly will want a letter that points out carefully every sloman error in his letter. At some point, I will probably send that as a response.
The July 8 deadline is a little further away than would be ideal, but we have the opportunity now to decide if we should enter into a definitive state deal and then arrange to have that ratified in dc as closure. My instict is that doing so in next few weeks may serve us better than trying to drag out a dag review for several months.
We can never do better than a state resolution. So we should aim to achieve that sooner rather than later.
----- Original Message -----
From: jeffrey epstein [littlestjeff@yahoo.com]
Sent: 06/01/2008 10:06 AM MST
To: Jay Lefkowitz; Ken Starr Ken.Starr@pepperdine.edu; Stephanie Thacker sdthacker@agmtlaw.com; Guy Lewis glewis@lewistein.com; Martin Weinberg owlmgw@worldnet.att.net; "avid@att.blackberry.net" avid@att.blackberry.net
Cc: me jeeproject@yahoo.com; mike tein tein@lewistein.com
Subject: responsibilities.
for the moment I've delegated the responsibilities as follows..
Stephanie - ceos rebuttal , she can also speak with authority regarding the paragraphs that reference her involvement
Marty and Mike- , Questions we would like posed , in a perfect world , to the various players .Alex sloman Marie, drew
Darren,- coordinating a sloman letter rebuttal. includes a line by line analysis of falsehoods,misrepresentations, and inaccurate facts
Jay and team, - structuring an allover presentation..- power point exhibits, transcripts, emails, documents
Ken Joe, and Alan, deciding the dag hot buttons,
question for tomorrows call.. Do we interact with Alex or Sloman in the interim what form. written only?
we have to deal with the state deadline. of Jul 8, do we enter a plea with fed consent?if so- to what?
civil cases? new york subpoenas?
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to postmaster@kirkland.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
when can we expect a first draft.
----- Original Message ----
From: Stephanie Thacker sdthacker@agmtlaw.com
To: jeffrey epstein littlestjeff@yahoo.com; Jay Lefkowitz JLefkowitz@kirkland.com; Ken Starr Ken.Starr@pepperdine.edu; Guy Lewis glewis@lewistein.com; Martin Weinberg owlmgw@worldnet.att.net; avid@att.blackberry.net
Cc: me jeeproject@yahoo.com; mike tein tein@lewistein.com
Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2008 2:38:52 PM
Subject: RE: responsibilities.
Could someone send me the final version of the letter we sent to CEOS following our March meeting when you get a chance? I want to make sure I have the final version. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: jeffrey epstein [mailto:littlestjeff@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 1:06 PM
To: Jay Lefkowitz; Ken Starr; Stephanie Thacker; Guy Lewis; Martin Weinberg; avid@att.blackberry.net
Cc: me; mike tein
Subject: responsibilities.
for the moment I've delegated the responsibilities as follows..
Stephanie - ceos rebuttal , she can also speak with authority regarding the paragraphs that reference her involvement Marty and Mike- , Questions we would like posed , in a perfect world , to the various players .Alex sloman Marie, drew
Darren,- coordinating a sloman letter rebuttal. includes a line by line analysis of falsehoods,misrepresentations, and inaccurate facts Jay and team, - structuring an allover presentation..- power point exhibits, transcripts, emails, documents Ken Joe, and Alan, deciding the dag hot buttons,
question for tomorrows call.. Do we interact with Alex or Sloman in the interim what form. written only?
we have to deal with the state deadline. of Jul 8, do we enter a plea with fed consent?if so- to what?
civil cases? new york subpoenas?
dag - for the moment
----- Original Message ----
From: Stephanie Thacker sdthacker@agmtlaw.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 7:38:37 AM
Subject: RE: responsibilities.
It will either be late today or tomorrow morning, I expect. Who shall this response be addressed to?
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 7:33 AM
To: Stephanie Thacker
Subject: Re: responsibilities.
when can we expect a first draft.
----- Original Message ----
From: Stephanie Thacker sdthacker@agmtlaw.com
To: jeffrey epstein littlestjeff@yahoo.com; Jay Lefkowitz JLefkowitz@kirkland.com; Ken Starr Ken.Starr@pepperdine.edu; Guy Lewis glewis@lewistein.com; Martin Weinberg owlmgw@worldnet.att.net; avid@att.blackberry.net
Cc: me jeeproject@yahoo.com; mike tein tein@lewistein.com
Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2008 2:38:52 PM
Subject: RE: responsibilities.
Could someone send me the final version of the letter we sent to CEOS following our March meeting when you get a chance? I want to make sure I have the final version. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: jeffrey epstein [mailto:littlestjeff@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 1:06 PM
To: Jay Lefkowitz; Ken Starr; Stephanie Thacker; Guy Lewis; Martin Weinberg; avid@att.blackberry.net
Cc: me; mike tein
Subject: responsibilities.
for the moment I've delegated the responsibilities as follows..
Stephanie - ceos rebuttal , she can also speak with authority regarding the paragraphs that reference her involvement Marty and Mike- , Questions we would like posed , in a perfect world , to the various players .Alex sloman Marie, drew
Darren,- coordinating a sloman letter rebuttal. includes a line by line analysis of falsehoods,misrepresentations, and inaccurate facts Jay and team, - structuring an allover presentation..- power point exhibits, transcripts, emails, documents Ken Joe, and Alan, deciding the dag hot buttons,
question for tomorrows call.. Do we interact with Alex or Sloman in the interim what form. written only?
we have to deal with the state deadline. of Jul 8, do we enter a plea with fed consent?if so- to what?
civil cases? new york subpoenas?