(no subject)

 I think if ken agrees, Filip should  be both convinced something is severely amiss here, and shocked by some of the details.i.e.  I hesitate to describe some of the shall we say unique conditions that we've had to deal with. I risk you thinking of me  a crackpot, who might also next swear they 've been abducted by little green men . Instead of a former judge and doj official. but here goes. Keep in mind this is only one example of what we have had to endure .Sloman  required as a condtion precedent to deferring prosecution , to the STATE, already unprecedented , the demand that Epstein pay a minimum of 150 k to a list of girls , all now adults, whose names he refused to give us until Epstein was is in jail. and even then Epstein defense  was to be limited to only ask one question, " have you ever met Epstein" . In addtion he must pay for an attorney chosen by the govt ( the first one  a close friend of the ausa live in boyfriend)  to represent
the adults in case they want to bring litigation against him. I know you think i've exaggerated tha facts but alas , in fact  I minimized them. they would also be told that if they chose their own attorney he would not be obligated to pay their fees , so they should choose the one the govt recommends. If that is not enough,  re the new york times leak - in every other leak case , it is usually  impossible to prove, as the journalist hides behind the priviledge. here, jay, reviewed the reporters contemporaneous notes . don't believe the spin of Epsteins high priced attnys, he has no defense. he wanted house arrest with special conditions . We actually  received the details of the govts theory of the case from the reporter. as the prosecutors refused to give it to us.