new

the initial pitch.. 1.Our team consists of professionals with over 250 years of criminal experience. In an abundance of caution , we have also consulted with outside ethics experts,and former justice dept officials .Tthe clear and unanimous consensus is they find the conduct outragious and frankly not one of them , has been able to recall seeing anything like this before.. .2 . After the state had conducted its own investigation and returned a grand jury indictment.,the federal gov't ,all the while refusing to coordinate with the duly elected district attorney, and his sex prosecutor of 13 years, ,, engaged in an extortion , to force the defendant himself to go the state ,and demand that he be charged with a crime greater than the state and grand jury thought appropriate. THey furher demanded he obtain a sentence much greater than the state wanted. They compounded their outrageous behavior by then demanding that he pay a list of people ,
unnamed to date, a minimum of 150 thousand dollars each. No matter what their actual damages. Then refusing the defendant the right to even contact these adults.This , in exchange for the gov't not prosecuting him for crimes, that they , the feds could only make the most tenuous connection to. The ausa then suggested the defendant be required to hire one of her friends as a
continengcy lawyer to , be paid for by the defendant to actually sue the defendant ,on behalf of a list of adults that she would make avaliable after sentencing.. They threatened to use a sex tourism statute 2423 ( with a min sentence of 5 years) , and apply it to a man going home to Florida, a state where he has had a home for twenty years. they also threatened , to bring a case based on the Internet luring statute,2422 that would have to be tortured beyond all recognition to apply.( there was no internet use at all). They demanded a jail sentence for someone , who had no criminal history,, no violence , drugs, no position of authority, then when they were confronted with an extensive brief as to why these atutes did not apply they threatened to bring a money crime based on a illegal money transmitting business, even though no such businesss actually existed.. After subpoenaing his tax returns , and medical records, they then suggested a money
laundering charge or a host of others including the mann act, obstruction etc. , even though the prerequisitie of a specified unlawful activity, could not be described

  ____________________________________________________________________________________

Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs