arrow_back
Fwd: The High Priced Water Point Home
1 message attach_file 1 attachment picture_as_pdf Source PDF
?
DKIESQ@aol.com Nov 12, 2007 3:46 AM
To
<jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Attached is the refresher of the water point house listed for 6.5 mm.
Best neighborhood on St. Thomas. Gated. 24 hour security.
Turnkey. Nothing required to move in. No renovations needed.
Largest house. Most amenities. Has enough rooms under same roof for
the kids and us and visiting family. Has a separate apartment for live in
help.
But . . . . extremely high price. Seller not actually listing
the house on MLS, and according to Sharon seller not motivated to sell by
cutting price all that much. Seller Wouldn't even counter at 5
MM. Seller won't consider renting.
If price and resale were not a consideration, this would be the
neighborhood and house that we would choose out of the houses we have
viewed.
Most importantly. I do not want to be piggish. My goal
is to make myself more useful to you by being on St. Thomas; it is not my goal
to get the most living space in exchange for moving to St. Thomas. I want
to do what would be helpful to you and do not want to add more issues for you to
deal with such as reselling this house if that should become necessary, which is
why we did not make this a serious choice for you to consider. It is
however, one of the houses that we could move into without any additional
work.
At this point, then, the only houses that we can find are:
This water point house.
The Havencrest house in Bakkeroe
CoteSud - A note about Cote Sud. The house could be tweaked to
provide us with a very comfortable and pleasant place to live. We do like
the house, so we are not just saying stick us here to be ridiculously
cooperative.
On the negative side, the house is not located in a premier
neighborhood. It is not a bad neighborhood. According to JEanne and
Sharon it is safe for us to live. It has solid booking as a short term
rental villa and commands short term rents at the higher end of the rental
scale; it's just not a premier neighborhood. Sharon claims it is the most
expensive house in the neighborhood and, if we are concerned about resale, we
should be very careful about purchasing this house for much more than 3.1
MM. It is currently listing for 3.9 mm. Last year, Sharon tells me,
the seller refused an offer for $3 mm, but only because there was a second
corporate seller who was indicating that it was going to purchase the house for
more than $3 MM. When the corporate purchaser did not work out and the
seller went back to discuss a sale with the $3 MM purchaser, the $3 MM purchaser
had already found another house.
On the plus side, Cote Sud can be turned into a 5 BR house by transforming
the GYM and Laundry room on the first floor into a bedroom and bath and building
a small laundry room extension outside of the kitchen, which the Builder had
already been considering. In addition, the kitchen and living room on the
main floor requires installation of a a/c splits. I am advised that all of
this could be done for less than $100,000. There is level space on the
exterior for the kids to play and the house is located behind an
electronic gate. Overall, however, the house is pretty on the inside
and does not need much in the way of renovations.
Michelle and I looked at two more houses today, but they turned out to be
disappointments. So right now, Water Point, Havencrest and CoteSud are the
only places we could find.
As you can read from the last message I got from Sharon that I forwarded to
you. Sharon is quite reluctant to tell the seller that we would only offer
2.5 mm for Havencrest for the limited 5 day period. Frankly, my analysis
is the same as yours although I am not sure that the market value is as low as
2.5 mm, but I don't believe that it is more than 3 MM, which was already
rejected by the seller. So, under the circumstances, I am not optimistic
about this as a reasonable choice and am not particularly concerned about
alienating the seller like sharon is. If the seller gets pissed. Who
cares. Noone else is even nibbling on this deal so . . .
So this is where we are. Wish it were easier, so you did not have yet
another thing on your plate to worry about. Sorry I can't find anything
easier..
Darren K.
Indyke
Attorney-At-Law
457 Madison Avenue
4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-750-1176
Fax: 212-750-0381
e-mail: dkiesq@aol.com
------------------------------
IRS Circular 230 Legend: Any advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Unless otherwise specifically indicated above, you should assume that any statement in this email relating to any U.S. federal, state, or local tax matter was written in connection with the promotion or marketing by other parties of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this email. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
=================================================================
Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any attachments contain information from Darren K. Indyke, Esq. that constitute attorney work product or that are otherwise confidential and/or privileged. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender at the above telephone number or electronic mail address. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law.
=================================================================
Attorney-At-Law
457 Madison Avenue
4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-750-1176
Fax: 212-750-0381
e-mail: dkiesq@aol.com
------------------------------
IRS Circular 230 Legend: Any advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Unless otherwise specifically indicated above, you should assume that any statement in this email relating to any U.S. federal, state, or local tax matter was written in connection with the promotion or marketing by other parties of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this email. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
=================================================================
Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any attachments contain information from Darren K. Indyke, Esq. that constitute attorney work product or that are otherwise confidential and/or privileged. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender at the above telephone number or electronic mail address. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law.
=================================================================
| From: | DKIESQ@aol.com | |
| Subject: | The High Priced Water Point Home | |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:31:08 GMT | |
| To: | jeeproject@yahoo.com |
