From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 10/5/2018 1:51:39 PM To: Weingarten, Reid Subject: Re: Re:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM Weingarten, Reid a wrote:
Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect | am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain
From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gqmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM
To: Weingarten, Reid Subject: Re: Re:
Maybe
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM Weingarten, Reid > wrote:
But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and
important?
From: J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM
To: Weingarten, Reid Subject: Re:
im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM Weingarten, Reid > wrote:
Had a gut that's where you would come out
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: J
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re:
fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in "todays dollars" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133