From: Weingarten, Rei
Sent: 10/5/2018 1:48:46 PM To: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] Subject: RE: Re:
Importance: — High
Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect | am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain
From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re: Re:
Maybe
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM Weingarten, nom = sti(‘i‘*d wrote:
But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and
important?
From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re:
im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM Weingarten, Reid ee ote:
Had a gut that's where you would come out
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: J
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re:
fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in "todays dollars") then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same
year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a Itd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its
all legal
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032821