arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030296

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030296.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 282 words · 1.5k chars

From: Philip Barden <>

Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:27:12 +0000 To: 6 Mxwe

Ce: Ross Gow <i - Subject: Re:

All

Tam back on line now.

I see the statement didn't go. Monday? Maybe tomorrow?

I will speak to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer but JE has a conflict with you and will want your silence as whilst you are being attacked there is less heat on him.

Either is lying or not. If we let her lie without challenge then the lies become the reality and that may lead to you facing investigation. These are serious allegations and In the UK prosecuting people who face allegations of sex abuse is now common place and a lot of resources are focused on this.

We can't sit back and let you be a conspirator by silence.

Your are not guilty and must follow Dershowtiz line. He is a leading lawyer and he hasn't followed the don't say anything for fear of litigation. He has rightly called Pe biutt and shouted his innocence.

You have to stand up and deny the allegations or be branded guilty by association and that may lead to other investigations and worse.

I feel I am going around in circles.

I know what is right to do and that is to shout your innocence. Try and get some rest. Call me tomorrow if you want anytime. Speak to Deshowitz.

Don't allay yourself to JE as that is not the way to go.

Best

Philip

Sent from my iPhone

On 10 Jan 2015, at 16:02, "G Maxwell"

wrote:

Iam out of my depth to understanding defamation and other legal hazards and don't want to end up in a law suit

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030296