arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 454 words · 2.6k chars

From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 1/20/2017 12:14:31 PM To: David Grosof Subject: Re: Your Special Day

Importance: — High

probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers. _centrifigal force is a pseudo

force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM, David Grosof qq wrote:

Cool. And the former question, of clarification?

Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone.

On Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: pretty well .

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM, David Grosof > wrote:

Probability as a force rather than a what?

Didn't suss out the next word...

Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?

Dz

Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone.

On Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. 1 think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of , can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own enxruption de encyption algorithm builtin. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM, David Grosof {> wrote:

At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote:

all good.A A thx.A A areas of interest,A A A A distribuitionsA in nature..A AAA 2 deception.A 3.A sleep.4.A power. 5 money.A 6 music and the brain. 7 , signal intellignece in the biologocal systems

Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart! The rest of the truncated message has been sent.

1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the "distributions in nature” issue?

7. "Signal intelligence in biol. systems" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172