TTERSON
my recollection. That’s my best
ersation that you had with this a indicating that this person was Edwards had engaged in unethi-
xat she said to me. She said to me sctly by her friend Virginia Rob- vernight for a period of time, that n me in any of the pleadings. And ie pleadings, or her lawyers who red her into including my name
o you that the details sworn to by
a
at, yes. She mentioned to me that % er, ever mentioned [me to her], 4 hat she had had any contact with, ressured into doing so by her law- 5
versation, the impression you had 4 ss who could provide information” Paul Cassell had acted unethically”
ovide the information becausé s ne forward. She didn’t want 10 ©
258
Fittuy Ricu
involved. But I knew she had provided me with information, yes, but I didn’t know, and | still don’t know, whether she is prepared to be a witness. I don’t know the answer to that question.
11:08 a.m.
Q: Was any request made by you for a meeting?
A: Yes.
Q: Let me back up then, if I could, please. Because what I want you to do, based upon your superb memory, is to tell us in as much detail as you possibly can recall everything that was said....
A: I'm not sure the request for the meeting came in the first call or the second call....The first call was basically, I'd really like to talk to your wife [Rebecca] about this. ’'m happy to fly down. I’m happy to talk to you on the phone. And we left it that they would think —that she would—that he would ask her to think about it. And that I could call back in a—in a few days and find out what her—what her current feelings were.
7 Q: Where were you when you received this phone call—or
when you made this phone call? Sorry.
i A: I think I was in New York. E Q: Do you know whether that phone call was made on a cell
phone or a landline?
A: I don’t remember.
: Have you attempted to gather your telephone records for pur- poses of responding to discovery requests in this case?
259
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022156