arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021865

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021865.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 218 words · 1.2k chars

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =|

NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO —

42

Q. I'm asking whether he was aware of I'm not asking about -- well, let me back up.

Are you aware of any witness who could be called who, as of December 30th, 2014, any person who could be called as a witness who would testify, I have knowledge that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor to support the allegation that Alan Dershowitz abused other minors?

MR. SCAROLA: Outside of information gathered through attorney/client or common interest privileged communications; is that correct?

MR. SIMPSON: No. It's not correct.

MR. SCAROLA: Okay. Then, I'm not going to permit him to answer the question to the extent that it includes a request for information within the attorney/client and common interest privilege.

MR. SIMPSON: Is it your position that the name of a person who could be called as a witness is somehow privileged?

MR. SCAROLA: It is my position that any information communicated within the scope of the confidential attorney/client communication is privileged information.

It is my position that any information

including names communicated in the scope of

ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021865