arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013212

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013212.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 338 words · 2.2k chars

296 16 AGI Preschool

Intelligence Type Test Linguistic

write a set of instructions speak on a subject

edit a written piece or work write a speech

commentate on an event

apply positive or negative ’spin’ to astory

Logical-

Mathematical perform arithmetic calculations

create a process to measure something analyse how a machine works

create a process

devise a strategy to achieve an aim assess the value of a proposition

Musical

perform a musical piece sing a song

review a musical work

coach someone to play a musical instrument

Bodily-Kinesthetic

juggle

demonstrate a sports technique

flip a beer-mat

create a mime to explain something toss a pancake

fly a kite

Table 16.4: Prototypical preschool intelligence assessment tasks, Part 1

This testing protocol abstracts away from the particularities of any one teacher or student, and focuses on effectiveness of communication in a human context rather than according to formalized criteria. This is very much in the spirit of how assessment takes place in human preschools (with the exception of the copying aspect): formal exams are rarely given in preschool, but pragmatic, socially-embedded assessments are regularly made.

By including the copying aspect, more rigorous statistical assessments can be made regarding efficacy of different approaches for a given AGI design, independent of past teaching experiences. The multiple copies may, depending on the AGI system design, then be able to be reintegrated, and further “learning” be done by higher-order cognitive systems in the AGI that integrate the disparate experiences of the multiple copies.

This kind of parallel learning is different from both sequential learning that humans do, and parallel presences of a single copy of an AGI (such as in multiple chat rooms type experiments). All three approaches are worthy of study, to determine under what circumstances, and with which AGI designs, one is more successful than another.

It is also worth observing how this test could be tweaked to yield a test of generalization ability. After passing the above, the AGI could then be given a description of a new task

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013212