10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
98 H3vlgiu2
MS. SCHULTZ: So it goes to a material argument that
defendants have advanced.
THI
ira]
COURT: So to the extent that becomes an issue,
and that's a whole other thing, as to whether she intended th
statement, I can see that.
Okay. All right. Anything else?
MS. SCHULTZ: Yes. I'm just going to say that this is
a motion in limine and there are no evidentiary problems with
this piece of evidence. This is the defendant herself on
camera, this is not hearsay, and there's no Federal Rule of
Evidence that should exclude this.
THI
1a
COURT: Okay. Do you want to add anything?
MS. MENNINGER: No, thank you, your Honor.
THI
Le
COURT: Okay. Thank you.
What else?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, we can take up the bifurcation issue that's presented in 662 and 766, and then there was a reply filed last evening.
THE: ‘COURT: “Yes.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think -- well, I don't think. The law is very clear on this issue in this circuit. There is a --
THI
Ed
COURT: Well, I think we can shorthand this. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
THI
1s
COURT: Yes, yes. Maxwell's money doesn't come in
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011401