10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
H3vlgiu2
MS. SCHULTZ:
THI
1s
COURT:
MS. SCHULTZ:
that this is not cause of action,
as evidence. This is a motion
evidence.
THI
Gl
COURT:
case that counsel has given me
The motion was
Your Honor,
All right.
it should
in limine to
Assume for
is accurate,
—- well,
even assuming,
97
Because it was denied, your Honor.
okay. arguendo, still be admitted
exclude it as
the moment that the
and then why would
it get in? What does it add?
MS. SCHULTZ: It adds state of mind, defendant's state
of mind in issuing --
2
THE The state
COURT: of mind didn't change in two days. MS. SCHULTZ:
Right. It says that she stood by her
statement and did not retract it.
THE COURT: Well, she certainly is standing by it today.
MS. SCHULTZ: And your Honor, it shows one other thing. Throughout this litigation defendant has tried to argue
that defendant had nothing to do with the defamatory
statements. In fact, just yesterday defendant's counsel was
saying that it was issued by her lawyer and by her press agent.
It's her statement, and in this video she is personally owning
it, and she can't hide behind her lawyer or her press agent.
=
THE
COURT: Oh, okay, okay, okay.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011400