10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
96 H3vlgiu2
THE COURT: Well, what do you say about the case
that's been cited?
MS. SCHULTZ: Well, about Adelson? I would say that
it's factually distinguished because here she is two days later
reiterating her defamatory statement. And I would also direct
you to the case in my brief, Wheelings v. Iacuone.
THI
ira]
COURT: Let me just get the time frame right.
MS~ SCHULTZ: Sure «
THI
ira]
COURT: The initial statement is January, and when is this?
MS. SCHULTZ: So, your Honor, the email that went to
the media, it was first issued on January 2, 2015; it was
published on January 3, 2015; and the statement took place the
next day, on January 4, 2015.
THE COURT: Okay. MS. SCHULTZ: A recent opinion in this district, the Wheelings case, makes it clear that you can't reargue summary
judgment on a motion in limine and also makes it clear that you
can't say, oh, because one person
THE COURT: The issue is, was the second statement defamatory?
MS. SCHULTZ: I think that was an issue at summary judgment that Ms. Giuffre opposed in its entirety, and I think
that's already been resolved.
=
THE COURT: How?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011399