arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011395

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011395.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 242 words · 1.4k chars

10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

92 H3vlgiu2

statement and later a press release which said, we stand by everything we said. It's directly on point. Your Honor there

held that such republication is not actionable. We set forth

that clearly in our argument 4 of the summary judgment motion, and plaintiff, in her response to summary judgment, made

absolutely no reference, no response, nothing with respect to

that argument. We, therefore, believe that she has conceded

the point and we would ask that no evidence regarding that

statement b ntered in the trial.

We predicted, and we were correct, that having not

argued it in response to our summary judgment motion, they

would try to use the opportunity of their response to this

motion in limine to make substantive arguments. They should

not be permitted to do so, your Honor. In any event, their

arguments that they have set forth in response --

r

THE COURT: I'ma little lost. Perhaps totally lost.

But the partial summary judgment, that's not been dealt with,

or has it?

MS. MENNINGER: It was not part of your Honor's ruling; ne.

THE COURT: Tell me the context of the summary

judgment.

MS. MENNINGER: Certainly, your Honor. There were a

number of things that we believed plaintiff had conceded

because they failed to respond to our requests in our summary

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011395