HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011382

id.

ne)

life)

wae) H3VOGIU1

in the way that we did.

I'm just going to let my counsel address any final issues.

MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, I don't have anything further to say on motion in limine number 6. The defendant has

not given any valid reason or justification for introducing any

evidence of prior sexual assault that should be excluded for

all the reasons in the brief and the oral argument over thes two days.

With regard to drugs, there are voluminous medical

records presented here. Defendant's counsel has stood up and

said there are false statements to doctors and have suggested

that Ms. Giuffre is doctor shopping. I'll submit that the

records do net reflect that.

Defendant apparently seeks to introduce a jotted down note here or there from medical records, but these are plainly hearsay, and a sentence fragment in the middle of a medical chart is not admissible evidence, it's hearsay. And then,

they're certainly not a party admission, they don't even

reflect the totality of what the conversation is between

patient and doctor.

Also, I would also submit that the prescription records show that they are not doctor shopping to a mass amounts of pills or medication. The prescription records speak

for themselves. You can count the number of pills that were

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011382