HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011378

id.

ne)

life)

Wee) H3VOGIU1

against her because they don't like her actions in that

particular circumstance as opposed to the merits of the case.

And by the way, we are going to strongly contest that

she's a tax cheat, so your Honor is going to have, I guess,

competing tax information, and jury instructions on whether

personal injury returns have to be reported on your return, all

of which is going to deflect the jury's time and attention, not to mention the Court's and counsel's, away from the fundamental issue of did Ms. Maxwell defame Ms. Giuffre. So that's our

response to the initial overview regarding 405, and I'm going

to turn the time over to my colleague now to dive into some

specifics.

MS. McCAWLEY: Thank you, your Honor. I'm going try to keep this very brief and just touch on some of the highlights quickly.

So we were talking initially at the beginning about

the issue of various pieces of different witnesses, whether

their information would come in, and we hit on the issue --— they brought up the issue of Mr. Freeh, and actually gave

you -- told you that he was going to be just somebody who was

going to sit on the stand and validate the FOIA response.

Well, very clear from the documents they've produced in this case, if I could hand them up, your Honor, this is the pages that they produced with respect to Mr. Freeh. And you'll

see on the first page, he gives his conclusion and he says,

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011378