arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011320

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011320.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 231 words · 1.3k chars

10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

1) H3VOGIU1

into consideration whether she could have sued six people for it, 20 other people for it, this case is about Maxwell and her defamation against my client.

So again, your Honor, if you look at Sack on Defamation, it addresses that directly, and we believe that that should not come into evidence.

So your Honor, that's the first chunk of the omnibus

motion that I was addressing. I'm not sure how you want to

take it, if you want to have opposing counsel speak on those issues now and then move to the others, or if you want us to keep moving through it?

THI

1a

COURT: What's your preference?

MS. McCAWLEY: I think keep moving through it would be

great.

THE COURT: What?

Gl

MS. McCAWLEY: To keep moving it through it, if that's

all right, so we can get through argument and then have them address it?

THE, COURT: Sure.

MS. McCAWLEY: Thank you, your Honor.

MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, this is Meredith Schultz for the plaintiff. The next article in the omnibus motion is to exclude testimony references to prior sexual assault. This is an issue that I spoke on yesterday related to another motion

regarding the same, so I'll keep it brief.

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011320