arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011307

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011307.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 215 words · 1.3k chars

10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

H3VOGIU1

client made statements about. So we were trying to streamline

the case to the statements about Maxwell and her involvement

with Epstein. So in the omnibus motion you'll see, for example, that

they have claimed she's made statements about other

individuals, and we say that that's not what's at issue, what's

at issue are the statements

=

THE COURT: That may be an issue of credibility. That

may be an issue of credibility. I'm talking about what we're

going to go to the jury on.

MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. And that is the statements that Maxwell made about my client.

THE COURT: And that's it.

MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor.

THE COURT: Let me ask the defense. Does that clarify

anything for you?

MS. MENNINGER: Could I have one second, your Honor?

THI

1a

COURT Sure. Of course.

MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think it's slightly more

nuanced. Plaintiff has claimed our client's statement is

false. Our client's statement is not just limited to the

little snippets that they included in their complaint, it's the

ntire statement. That entire statement talks about Virginia Giuffre's allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven

untrue.

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011307