arrow_back Search

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010935

House Oversight Committee
insert_drive_file IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010935.txt description DOCUMENT text_fields 392 words · 2.3k chars

unit, say dollar, is worth exactly the same as another. Most essential of all, money

should be something actually and reliably valued.

What meets all these criteria? Gold has been a contender since ancient times. But how reliable is its value? Spain and Portugal stockpiled gold and silver from the new world for two centuries, and bought nothing but inflation for their trouble. Gold is good for filling teeth, and for displaying status so long as it is rare. Then what is

better?

Two brilliant and dangerous adventurers, the Scotsman John Law and the Irishman Richard Cantillon, proposed land. France in 1720 had no new world mines, and needed money. It had plenty of land in Mississippi. Law and Cantillon put two and two together. | think they sincerely believed their advice to The Duke D’Orleans, the regent after the death of Louis XIV, that land could be the most reliable basis of value then known. More than that, I think they were probably right. But it wasn’t reliable enough. Early investors in paper rights to the land had made a mint as others crowded in. Market euphoria led to more paper rights than underlying value. You've heard that one before. Law and Cantillon saw the crash coming. It would be called the “Mississippi bubble”. Cantillon sold out just in time. Law preferred to face the music, as I would in the Neutral Zone a quarter millennium later. Land wasn’t

the answer.

I can’t call Law and Cantillon good guys like the emir. Both seem to have committed murder for money, Law long before and Cantillon long after, in scandals in London having nothing to do with the bubble. But they had good days. Cantillon’s book, which I know only from descriptions by economic historians, seems to be a masterpiece of the obvious-in-hindsight. Law went down with the ship, like a mensch, and seems to have kept the trust and friendship of many backers he had bankrupted. I mention the plusses of these two men to remind us that the truth is

seldom black and white, and to mitigate the folly of the French in trusting them.

Money today, in the United States and elsewhere, is not backed by any commodity. It

is “government fiat money” backed by the taxing power of government. That may be

Chapter 1: Recollections 1/06/16 19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010935