326
033638 1 couple of lines above it that do refer to Virginia 0338027 1 A. The lawyer -- look, this is not the first
033633 2 Roberts, put it in the context. 033827 2 time --
033641 3 My question is: Does that, fairly read, 033827 3 Q. I'm not asking the --
33646 4 constitute testimony that Virginia Roberts and Professor oxaa20 4 A. -~a lawyer has cited the wrong line number ox3e4s § Dershowitz were in the house at the same time? 33331 5 ona transcript or something, and if you're suggesting o33681 6 A. Those three sentences, three fines. 033033 6 that -- you know, I will concede that I cited the wrong ossess | 7 Q. What -- yes, what the brief cites. o33a38 «7 line number for that particular assertion.
o3sses7 8 A. Those -- those three lines: “Not sure. When os3aat 8 Q. And this is what I want to clarify: When you o370 9 Mr. Dershowitz was visiting. Uh-huh. How often did he | 03342 9 say the wrong line number, if you look at the quotation,
03346 10 there is, up above -- you cited 18 to 20 -- 22 to 25 -- o3e46 11 no, 18 to 20. I'msorry. You cited 18 to 20 which is
033706 10 come?" Those -- those three lines, I agree, that looks
o3a7zio 11 ‘like a miscitation there. I agree with you on that. oss714 12 Q. And isn't it true that -- first of all, 033716 13 nothing else is cited in the brief or elsewhere to
o33ass 12 -- do you see that? o33as7 13 A. Ido see 18 to 20, yes. oxsase 14 Q. And those lines don't refer to Virginia
03:37:22 14 support -- put -- put aside.
033901 15 Roberts coming to the house, correct? 03:39:02 16 A. Lines 18 to 20 do not refer to Virginia 033910 17 Roberts -- oh, no, wait a minute. Now, this is --
o3a723 15 Other than Virginia Roberts's own testimony, 03.3726 16 this is the only evidence that you cited to the court to 033730 17 support --
o3s7a1 18 A. No, no, no, no, no. That would require a oz312 18 because when I fook at it here, line 15:
033738 19 30-minute answer. o3aa17 19 "Do you have any recollection of V.R.,
0330-20 20 Virginia Roberts, coming to the house when
oxa7as 20 Q. Okay. I won't ask you a 30-minute answer -- 03:37:37 24 MR. SCAROLA: How about -- how about wrapping 033738 22 it up then because it's now 12:10. oar 23 MR. SIMPSON: I will wrap it up. I have one 033742 24 more -- one more question. 033743 25 THE WITNESS: Okay.
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400
033021 21 Prince Andrew was there?"
03:30:23 22 Answer: "It could have been. I'm not sure.
03:39:28 23 "Not sure. When Mr. Dershowitz was
0330-28 24 visiting?”
03:30:30 25 So now when I read it, actually, I'm now ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400
325 327
033743. 1+ +=BY MR. SIMPSON: 03332 1 going to withdraw my earlier answer, I would -- because o33743 2 Q. And that is: I just want to confirm that you 033935 2 you know, it's getting late in the day. I'm getting a
033747 3 do agree with me that what was cited to the court for 033937 3 little fuzzy here. When Mr. Dershowitz was visiting,
033750 4 the proposition that they were together, in this 03340 4 uh-huh, could be an affirmative answer read in context o337s2 5 sentence, doesn't support that proposition? o33045 5 to saying, I don't recall about Prince Andrew, but I do os37s4 G A. I will agree with you that there appears to 033947 6 recall Virginia Roberts being there. And I think when 033756 7 bea miscitation of the line number -- of the lines 18 o33e49 % we unpack the entirety of the deposition, which we don't o33a01 8 through 20. o3a982 8 have time right now, that the context that I'm
o33a02 9 Now, you're saying that there is not osaaxss 9 suggesting now would be accurate. So I am not prepared
033804 10 information outside of 8 -~ lines 18 through 20 to 033087 10 to say, as I sit here right now, that those were the
033303 11 support the allegation, and that's going to require a
032050 11. wrong line numbers.
033011 12 much longer answer. o34001 12 Perhaps those are the correct line numbers,
os3a12 13 Q. I don't want a long answer, but I do want to 03-4003 13 but what I think I should have done was to cite
oaza15 14 clarify. When you say “outside” -- oases 14 additional parts of the transcript that would have, in osaets 15 MR. SCAROLA: You also said one more o3ae15 16 question.
os3eis 17 MR. SIMPSON: Well, I -- let me just finish
oszate 18 this, so we are not going to have this hanging,
osaato 15 context, made clear that the assertion was correct. oaaots 16 MR. SCAROLA: With that --
oxa0is 17 MR. SIMPSON: I -- I just need to finish this 034016 18 one or two questions, but this is the topic, so
os4o18 19 fet me finish it.
o34019 20 BY MR. SIMPSON:
oxao19 21 Q. Did you ever watch the video --
cade 22 MR. SCAROLA: Running out of tape --
o3x4o19 23 BY MR. SIMPSON:
03:40:22 24 Q. _ -- of the transcript?
03.4022 25 MR. SCAROLA: We are also running out of tape ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400 (954) 331-4400 10/20/2015 01:08:15 PM Page 324 to 327 of 335 44 of 46 sheets
oxzaig 19 because I want to make sure we are communicating. 03:36:21 20 THE WITNESS: Okay. Sure.
03:33:21 21 BY MR. SIMPSON:
03:38:22 22 Q. I understand you're -- you're saying that
03:32 23 there -- there may be evidence -- 03:38:26 24 A. Yeah. o3:38.27 25 QQ. -- elsewhere?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010884