wo Ory DU WN F
NNN NNN HH BH Be oe oe Be Be Re AB WNE OCW OIA HM BWNR OO
Beach police department says.
Q. You never read those reports?
A. I don't know which reports you're referring to.
Q. All of the reports about Jeffrey Epstein.
MR. SCOTT: Asked and answered yesterday on this whole line.
A. I probably did not read all the reports on Jeffrey Epstein. I'm sure I've read some of them.
I do not reeall -- MR. SCOTT: Be careful about any work -- attorney-client privilege. THE WITNESS: Right.
A. I don't remember my name coming up. [ was
the lawyer during that period of time. BY MR. SCAROLA:
Q. To the extent that Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell relied upon detailed reports from the Palm Beach police department in order to assess the credibility of Virginia Roberts, would it be reasonable for them to rely upon police reports?
A. I would hope that they would rely on all the police reports, including the ones that showed that she was involved in criminal actions, including the ones that would show that she took money as an
wo on Dm Bw NH
NNNNNN BH ee eB eB Ep Oe wWwN HF Ow MAHAN AWN PR O
this. A. Excuse me one second.
MR. SCOTT: You know, you think this is funny and I think this man's -- and I think this man's --
MR. SCAROLA: I think it's improper for you to be coaching the witness in the middle of examination. If you think that there's something that needs to be brought out, you do that in cross examination. You don't feed him information that you want him to be reading in the middle of my examination of this witness.
MR. SCOTT: No. But it's also true that under our rules, when you read portions of a deposition, he has the ability to read other portions of the deposition which clarify the answers. That's done in every courtroom on every time a witness -- you have selected portions of it that are not accurate based on other portions and I am having him review them since you did not offer him the deposition to review.
MR. SCAROLA: And that's what you do --
MR. SCOTT: And I think that's totally proper --
wo ony Dm FF WH PH
NN NPP BB pe Be Rp NP OU MNYHA HB WN HO
298
adult to provide sexual services to people.
I] would hope they would look at all the reports, not just selected portions of those reports.
Q. Would that include the reports of the Federal Bureau of Investigation?
A. I would hope so.
Q. Would that include the information provided by the U.S. Attorney's Office?
A. lL would sure hope so, and I could tell you that the --
Q. Would that include -
A. Let me just say that the U.S. Attorney's Office lias told me unequivocally that my name never came up in any context of any accusation against me during the negotiations.
Q. Is this part of your work product that you're waiving right now?
MR. SWEDER: No, no.
A. My conversation with Jeffrey Sloman is not work product.
MR. SCOTT: Here's a -- BY MR. SCAROLA:
Q. What is the work product --
MR. SCOTT: Excuse me. Please review
wo MwA HM B® WHY
NNNNN NPP PP BP RP BP RP oP UR WNH OU MIAN BW NRF O
300
MR. SCAROLA: -- in cross examination. It is --
MR. SCOTT: -- todo. No --
MR. SCAROLA: -- improper.
MR. SCOTT: No.
MR. SCAROLA: There's no question pending as to which that's relevant. But let's take a look at what you're showing him.
MR. SCOTT: Sure. Why don't you read it into the record?
THE WITNESS: I've read it.
MR. SCOTT: Read it into the record so that Mr. Scarola is advised. A. "Okay. When Alan Dershowitz was in the. house, | understand you to say that these local Palm Beach girls would come over to the house while he was there, but you're not sure if he had a massage from any of these girls?
"Exactly.
“And what would he do while these girls were in the house?
“He would read a book with a glass of
wine by the pool, stay inside. "Did he ever talk to any of the girls? "Il don't know, sir.
31 (Pages 297 to 300)
www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010813