oN Am Wd
-- believe that. . recall the following testimony -- . It wouldn't be true if he said it. Q. Yes, sir. Weill, do you recall the following testimony having been given by Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez in a deposition that was taken on August 7, 2009?
"Question: Mr. Rodriguez, you stated last time that there were guests at the house, frequent guests from Harvard. Do you remember that testimony?
"Answer: Yes, ma'am,
"Question: Was there a lawyer from Harvard named Alan Dershowitz?
"Answer: Yes, ma'am,
"Question: And are you familiar with the fact that he's a famous author and famous lawyer?
"Answer: Yes, ma'am,
"Question: How often during the six months or so that you were there was Mr. Dershowitz there?
“Answer: Two or three times.
"Question: And did you have any knowledge of why he was visiting there?
that testimony? A. Yes. MR. SCOTT: Objection. This is totally improper cross exainination of a witness by
trying to use a deposition. The only purpose of doing this is to interject this into the record, which has no relevance and would not be admissible at trial. And in any case, he never actually has my client doing any of the things that you've accused him of. Go ahead, let's go ahead and do it. Answer the question. Answer the question. MR. SCAROLA: He did. A. Yes, [remember that. MR. SCAROLA: He said yes. A. Yes, [remember that, yes. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. And do you know why it was that back in 19 -- excuse me, back in 2009, August of 2009, four and a half years before you allege that this story about you was being made up out of whole cloth, that lawyers representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims, including Katherine Ezell, E-Z-E-L-L from Bob Josefsberg's office, who had filed the complaint alleging that you had -- excuse me, that Virginia
290
"Answer: No, ma‘am.
"Question: You don’t know whether or not he was a lawyer acting as a lawyer or whether he was there as a friend?
“Answer: I believe as a friend.
“Question: Were there also young ladies in the house at the time he was there?
"Answer: Yes, ma'am.
"Question: And would those have included, for instance, Sarah Kellen, Nada Marcinkova?
"Answer: Yes, ma'am.
“Question: Were there other young ladies there when Mr. Dershowitz was there?
“Answer: Yes, ma'am.
"Question: Do you have any idea who those young women were?
"Answer: No, ma'am.
"Question: Were there any of these -- excuse me. Were any of these young women that you have said came to give massages?
“Answer: Yes, ma'‘ant."
Do you recall that testimony having been
given -- A. Yes. Q. -— and those answers having been given to
oOo DN KH F&F WD EK
NNNNN NB eH BP Be ee Re oR oR mf WN KF OO WoW OT HD Mm PW DN PH
292
Roberts had been lent out for sexual purposes to academicians, were asking specific questions about you? Do you know why it was in 2009 they were doing that?
A. have no idea that it happened. And I imagine that they had a list of every academic that was in the house. Probably included --
MR. SCOTT: | want to object to this whole procedure because you're taking pieces out of - the record and not reading other pieces that totally absolve my client. For example, there's testimony by him that says --
MR. SCAROLA: Is this an objection?
MR. SCOTT: Yes, it's a statement into the record just like you're putting into the record. There's -- | want to show this to my client and refresh his memory as to some other testimony by this witness --
MR. SCAROLA: There's no question pending as to what you can -- as to what you can refresh your client's memory. What you are doing is coaching him.
MR. SCOTT: No, I'm not.
MR. SCAROLA: Inproperly.
MR. SCOTT: And you are improperly reading
29 (Pages 289 to 292)
www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010811