From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:03 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Yes, that is not an acceptable outcome. On Oct 14, 2014 8:00 AM, "jeffrey E." =Itjeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> =rote: concernred about being in bed with them for years foward. . =C240 i know you understand On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Kathy Ruem=ler > wrote: Generally, a non-pros agreement is akin to=that -- here, though, Dal seems to be treating non-pros agreements like de=erred pros agreements. That is one of the questions I want to explor= today. On Oct 14, 2014 7:42 AM, "jeffrey E." =Itjeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote: would there be an equivalent of an alford plea =C24k for the bank? Q=A0 please note The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or b= e-mail to jeev=cation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_01772391 EFTA02590403 =C24k please note The information co=tained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client pr=vileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for JEE Unauthorized use= disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is str=ctly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this commu=ication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e=mail to jeevaca=ion@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereo=, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> 2 EFTA_R1_01772392 EFTA02590404