arrow_back Search

EFTA01006468

DOJ Epstein Files
folder Dataset 9 insert_drive_file EFTA01006468.pdf description PDF text_fields 349 words · 2.2k chars
open_in_new View original source

From: Richard Kahn To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Layer 1 Term Draft Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:32:55 +0000 not sure what Jeremy means by Layer I? please advise thank you Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 tel fax cell Begin forwarded message: From: Jeremy Rubin <MI > Subject: Layer 1 Term Draft Date: July 26, 2018 at 3:47:38 AM EDT To: Richard Kahn Hi Richard, The linked operating agreement seems relatively close to what will work for Layer1. reasonable starting point to you? I think the open questions around this are, to me: Does this look like a 1) The founders will have 70% of the units, but will distribute some portion of that to early employees. We want these somehow to be redistributable to employees under vesting schedules. We also want to limit the governing power of these shares until the initial capital is returned (see below). One option would be to have the 70% vest and not have voting power while vesting... 2) We want is to add language that has some sort of "preferred distribution" so that we get priority on capital return until initial capital is returned. E.g., Any distributions, dividends, etc, must be paid to solely to the investors in proportion to the amount invested up until the total distributions made reach the Preference Distribution Limit. Following this point, distributions, dividends, etc will be paid solely to non-investors in proportion to the amount owned until the total distributions reach twice the Preference Distribution Limit. Following this point, all distributions, dividends, etc, must be paid in proportion to ownership with no preference for investor or non-investor. 3) It's not clear to me who should be a Managing Partner -- I think maybe 2 investors and one of the founders? Once enough of their units vest/initial capital repayed they should be able to take the majority of seats? EFTA01006468 4) We want to define a point before they begin fund raising for their SPVs where we can vote (with other MP) to dissolve. Best, Jeremy EFTA01006469