arrow_back Search

EFTA00774276

DOJ Epstein Files
folder Dataset 9 insert_drive_file EFTA00774276.pdf description PDF text_fields 182 words · 1.3k chars
open_in_new View original source

From: "Martin Weinberg" To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:01 +0000 Attachments: Crimes_and_Criminal_Procedure_-_18_USC_Section_2255_-_US_Code.pdf Putting aside NPA, and your arguably involuntary waivers, anyone can suit in federal court relying on claims of 2255 i.e. Congress has conferred civil jurisdiction on private parties claiming injury due to violations of the various predicates. The issue is whether they can meet their burdens of proof. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. Original message from Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>: since the josephbug people are suing in federal court though there is no diversity.. and they have not brought up the npa, do we leave it , without a fight over jurisdiction which is dealt with in the npa, or raise it at somepointl EFTA00774276