arrow_back Search

EFTA00211699

DOJ Epstein Files
folder Dataset 9 insert_drive_file EFTA00211699.pdf description PDF text_fields 268 words · 1.8k chars
open_in_new View original source

From: Brad Edwards <brad@pathtojustice.com> r Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:15:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png I just read the story. That is really a terrible form of exploitation. Unbelievable. Great work! I am currently investigating an overdose of a drug center patient who was dropped off unconscious to a hospital in Palm Beach, so this story is particularly interesting. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Imailto:Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:09 PM To: Brad Edwards <brad@pathtojustice.com> Subject: RE: Question re your "statement of undisputed facts" Hey! Just saw that you settled the Maxwell case. Congratulations! Don't know if you have been reading the Sun-Sentinel but I just finished the first ever human trafficking/health care fraud case (defendant Kenny Chatman). IFFRIFIBrad Edwards [mailto:brad@pathtojustice.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 9:05 AM Subject: Re: Question re your "statement of undisputed facts" I'll check. I definitely remember having the conversation with you agreeing that you could redact the private email address. I don't remember off hand seeing them but if you think you sent them then you are probably right. EFTA00211699 I'll look. Sent from my iPhone On May 25, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Hi Brad — In paragraph 29, it states "In discovery in this case, the U.S. Attorney's Office has not produced any emails sent to or from any home e-mail addresses of its prosecutors." I produced many such emails and you and I agreed that I could redact my home email address so that it wouldn't be made public. Have I lost my mind about this? Thanks. EFTA00211700