From: ' . AFLS " To: Subject: . . Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:54:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Setting aside the non-pros and prosecuting him as though the Non-pros had never been signed. From pogim Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Suggest what thing? --- Original Message Fro To: Sent: on Sep Subject: RE: (USAFLS) 011 No. He already served his sentence in state court and performed all his other obligations under the Non-Pros (including paying damages to 30-some girls). I argued it would be a Due Process violation to even suggest such a thing. From, Sent: To: Subje Have we conceded that a showing that we violated the CVRA would justify reoopening/setting aside the nonpros? Fro To: Sent EFTA00205768 Subject: RE: Ideally to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein and then to somehow convince us (probably through public pressure via Se To: Subjec : What is the relief jane does want in the cvra case? EFTA00205769