From: ' To: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Your response Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:01:49 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Response_to_Remedies_-_MFK_-_1-24-2012_639p.docx (USAFLS)" •cl I don't think I would do that. Here's what wrote. undertook to review and edit the section Tuesday night. He just gave me some (3 or 4) minor cosmetic edits. I have never really read it through fully, but I had planned to change the intro to say it is a brief, non-comprehensive treatment of issues the court need not reach. In any event, I have to get on a conference call. Let me know what you think. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda January 26, 2012 10:47 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your response I think I would have to see the rest of the other response first. I might then cut and paste one small portion of it into this response. \ U.S. \ttorney Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:46 AM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your response If you have any thoughts, suggestions, additions, etc., I am open to them. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda January 26, 2012 10:38 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Your response Hi Sony, I just realized that I forgot to respond about your email from last night. I think it looks fine. I am not crazy about the fact that we don't cite any law, but they don't cite anything either. EFTA00205493 Thank you so much for your help on that case! Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax EFTA00205494